Financial Services

On Wednesday, the Asset Building Program was pleased to host Gar Alperovitz for a conversation about his new book, “What then Must We Do? Democratizing Wealth and Building a Community-Sustaining Economy from the Ground Up.”. A recording of the event is available here.

Alperovitz is a political economist and co-founder of the Democracy Collaborative, an organization based at the University of Maryland working to develop innovative community development policies that promote shared wealth ownership. As introduced by Asset Building Program director Reid Cramer, Aplerovitz is a “big thinker,” whose work on democratic access to wealth and capital has the potential to shift our thinking about economic equality and shared prosperity.

What if I told you that very poor people, living in the most expensive city in America in the aftermath of a massive economic collapse, were challenged to save $500 and not touch it for a year with the promise of a 50 percent bonus if they succeeded? Do you think that some of them would be able to do it? A few?

What would you think the impact of that small amount of money would be? Equally small? Would you think that sequestering those resources would make families more likely to go into debt? More likely to skip paying their bills?

The Asset Building News Week is a weekly Friday feature on The Ladder, the Asset Building Program blog, designed to help readers keep up with news and developments in the asset building field. This week's topics include inequality, retirement, the workforce, and financial services.

Update 5/22/13: The original version of this post incorrectly used the term "credit score" where "credit check" or "credit history" would have been more appropriate and accurate. The post has been edited to reflect that correction. Kevin Drum at Mother Jones has a piece that explains the process by which the credit reporting agencies deal with employee screening. Specifically, employers may request prospective employees' credit histories via a credit check, but these histories do not contain an actual credit score. Thank you to Greg Fisher at creditscoring.com for pointing out the error.

The use of credit checks to inform hiring decisions has been getting some much deserved scrutiny recently. Over the weekend, Charles Ellison for the Philadelphia Tribune and Gary Rivlin for the New York Times took a look at the practice of employers evaluating a job applicant's credit as part of the employment decision-making process. Ellison chronicles recent legislative efforts to curb the practice and points out that campaign finance data shows lawmakers are receiving sums of money from major credit reporting companies. Rivlin spoke with non-profit service providers and unemployed individuals who have experienced the negative effects of this phenomenon first hand.

On the surface, using credit checks as part of employment screening may seem like a simple, data-driven way for employers to ascertain a candidate's reliability. Upon closer inspection, however, using credit checks in this way is ineffective and exacerbates inequality.

The uproar from the financial industry over President Obama’s proposed “retirement cap” is preposterous, but unsurprising. In the usual vein, the industry presents the proposed limit as an attack on the hard worker and diligent saver, despite the fact that it comes nowhere close to affecting even the top 1 percent of earners. In fact, it doesn’t touch the top one-tenth of one percent. For every 10,000 IRA account holders, a whole six accounts would be affected by the limit. That number is even lower for 401(k) accounts. As Fred Hiatt for the Washington Post explained, the employee-benefit lobby quickly mobilized to forestall this outrageous “’socialist idea’ of ‘raiding’ retirement accounts.” And it is succeeding.

Editor's note: This post was authored by Julia Arnold, a Research Fellow with the Global Assets Project, and originally appeared on the Center for Financial Inclusion's blog.

Many of the challenges to saving faced by the world’s poorest people were highlighted in the recent Washington Post article Microsavings Programs Build Wealth, Pennies at a Time.  Among others, the article articulated two especially salient points around microsavings: 1) we know the poor save, and 2) savings can help poor people withstand shocks to their income (such as unexpected medical emergencies or job loss) without going further into debt and poverty. However, low-income people tend to rely on informal methods of savings, often putting their money at risk of being lost, stolen, or ruined by floods or rodents. Having a safe, reliable place to save is both beneficial to and desired by the world’s poorest people. 

The Asset Building News Week is a weekly Friday feature on The Ladder, the Asset Building Program blog, designed to help readers keep up with news and developments in the asset building field. This week's topics include financial security, housing, gender equality, the safety net, and workforce and consumer protection.

As it turns out, consumer advocates might have underestimated the impact of payday loans on consumers. We have written pretty extensively about the debt trap or cycle of borrowing that short-term, high-cost loans have on consumers. We are now getting real data and first impressions are that it is worse than we thought. The good news is that federal regulators are poised to take action.

The Asset Building News Week is a weekly Friday feature on The Ladder, the Asset Building Program blog, designed to help readers keep up with news and developments in the asset building field. This week's topics include housing, unemployment, financial products, taxes, and inequality.

After our event on "prize-linked savings" yesterday, I sat down with Joanna Smith-Ramani of D2D and recorded a short podcast focused on the basics. What are prize-linked savings? Where did the idea come from? Can giving people prizes really help to induce more savings? What's happening with this idea now? You can listen to our conversation here: